View Single Post
Old 08-17-2006, 01:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
Enthalpy
EMS Harmonizer
 
Enthalpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,219
Thanks: 8
Thanked 54 Times in 42 Posts

My Google Map



Send a message via AIM to Enthalpy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weasy2k
ahh i take that back then...would it be sever enough tho?

Would a heat build up of sorts occur?

Being a hydraulics person i like to learn the technical crap too :P
The regulator guarantees injector 4 is properly pressurized. Because of the pressure drop issue, that means injector 1 is over-pressurized at the high output volume of the walbro. This means cylinder 1 is overfueled the worst, and the overfueling decreases as you traverse the fuel rail.

When boosting, the closed-loop system isn't active, so cylinder 1 will be overfueled, which can lead to carbon buildup over time and increase the compression ratio.

When not boosting, the closed-loop system sees the overfueled condition across all cylinders and pulls fuel from all cylinders. This means 1 still runs slightly rich, and 4 runs slightly lean.

This last part is what I wonder about. Toyota chose the point at which the ECU comes out of closed-loop assuming the cylinders were fairly evenly-fueled. Now that 4 is slightly lean, is this a problem? Does allowing slightly lean operation right before the point where the ECU starts dumping fuel create the potential for detonation?

I don't honestly know. Personally, I got a Wolfkatz rail so I wouldn't have to answer this question.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MR. 2Lanes
Would I need to change much other than my regulator if I have a Gen3 engine?
All indications I have seen to date seem to point to the fact that this issue isn't present in the already-larger gen 3 fuel rail.
Enthalpy is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.13758 seconds with 16 queries