View Single Post
Old 12-17-2007, 10:30 AM   #65 (permalink)
fosley
Cage Fighter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 110
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts





Send a message via Yahoo to fosley
Last time I did the math, at 50 mph the difference between 0 power and that Armstrong guy at peak power was about a 2 mph difference. That's assuming you're using a hill to get to 50 mph, so if you aren't, adding that difference (around 500 watts, as I recall) would get you the 2 mph--though that would mean you're putting out way more power than Armstrong, which isn't something I would require to be considered a "good rider".

Of course, the design of the bike makes a difference--they've gotten pedal-powered vehicles to over 200 mph--but I don't think 65 mph is normally acheivable without either a draft or a hill. According to my calculations, the fast road bikes where your body is horizontal (minimizing wind resistance) can get to just under 70 mph on an 18% grade, or just over 70 mph if you add in the 500 watts, but 18% is *steep*.
fosley is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.20122 seconds with 16 queries