Quote:
Originally Posted by te51levin
I'm going to disagree with this. A local friend (unfortunately, not someone on this board) and I spent a day with his stock '85, comparing exhaust systems. We used Streetdyno to test the results and found that replacing the stock muffler and cat with a test pipe and SC muffler gained five peak horsepower and eight at redline. A much louder setup with a small glasspack was worth seven peak horsepower and eleven at redline compared to the stock cat and muffler. So there are definately tangible power gains to be had by making intelligent changes to a naturally aspirated AW11!
One important note to add is that we found NO LOSS in low-end or midrange power with either setup. That is solid evidence against the old muffler-shop myth that you need back pressure to make torque. It's not the back pressure you need; it's reasonably sized header tubing. Big headers will kill velocity at low RPM, and that hurts torque. Small headers that provide good velocity at low engine speeds will add back pressure at high speeds and kill horsepower. Every thing's a compromise.
For those who don't know what Streetdyno is, please read up before attacking. It's not a real dyno, but it does the same thing in much the same way by recording acceleration via the ignition signal and calculating that into a full-spectrum horsepower and torque plot.
|
I remember reading your posts about this on another forum. I don't disagree with your findings.
I just doubt the thread started has a "test pipe" in his system. I assumed by "larger muffler" that a shop just welded on a fart can and he's probably still running stock cat and pipes. I wouldn't expect any performance out of that.