Quote:
Originally Posted by midship1
I own a Mk.1 NA and want a Mk.2 NA. Does the extra torque from the 5SFE make it "seem" a lot faster around town than the 4AGE?
For those of you who own or have owned both - which one did you prefer? Which one brought a "  " to your face more often? lol
Btw, is the fuel economy on a Mk.2 about the same or a little worse than the Mk.1? |
Fuel economy wise the mk2 na 5sfe on the freeway sucked a little more gas barely noticeable but city driving you definitely noticed it,plus the mk2 has a bigger tank,and thats with a tune up done to my mk2.
with the 91na you will definitely noticed the torque of the line.its good for city driving you will appreciate the usable torque there no denying, 1.6 against a 2.2 there's no mystery.
To answer your second question it all depends: ive own 85,86,87,89sc,455hp 93t,and current 91na,I like them all if you like the modern look get an mk2,if you like the boxy look keep your mk1.my track experience with the mk1 has more more under steer but you feel more connection with the car, just set the suspension right and your good.but the funnest one of them all is my old
fully built 89 super red sc. the sound of the whining is intoxicating.