Beams Dyno results registry.

[2old2rusty]

Hopefully the information will be useful to other members as well.

[nikk1877]

Originally Posted by 2old2rusty

Hopefully the information will be useful to other members as well.

yes very usefull!

can we also see your enlarged throttle body? I want to try this myself.

[Celica RA45]

if you are dynoing your car 2old2 rusty please keep it in 4th gear as 3rd increases power and torque .do it in 4th which is straight through ,you will loose power but it will be more spot on in hp figures
ps i use 3'' exhaust

[2old2rusty]

Originally Posted by nikk1877

yes very usefull!

can we also see your enlarged throttle body? I want to try this myself.

I'm sorry I did not take a picture of it. I looks exactly as before, only slight change in dimension; I think it's about bigger by 2 mm or so, & a bigger butterfly to match, that's all.

if you are dynoing your car 2old2 rusty please keep it in 4th gear as 3rd increases power and torque .do it in 4th which is straight through ,you will loose power but it will be more spot on in hp figures
ps i use 3'' exhaust

Thanks for the tips, bro. I'll keep that in mind & inform the tuning shop to run it in 4th gear the next time.

Wow, 3" exhaust ..... with the horsepower your car is making, I guess that's a proper match.

[RST]

Sorry if I've missssed something but dyno results should be supplied with the supplier and RON off the fuel? (never thought of that before -are we supposed to do it anyway?)

[Celica RA45]

mines done in 4 th gear and im using pump fuel ,which is shell V power racing 100 octane ,with 13.5 to 1 comp etc and the new figure at the moment is 186.3 kws at the back wheels at the same dyno .
this new figure which will go up to 190 in a coulpe of weeks is with 2 stage injection

[Roman]

front wheel drive gearboxes dont necessarily have a 1:1 ratio for 4th, SW20s dont anyway. I dont think there's the same advantage to doing so, as there is with a RWD gearbox where everything is 'in line' so to speak.

[2old2rusty]

Mine's filled with Shell V-Power RON 97.

[2old2rusty]

Originally Posted by Celica RA45

if you are dynoing your car 2old2 rusty please keep it in 4th gear as 3rd increases power and torque .do it in 4th which is straight through ,you will loose power but it will be more spot on in hp figures
ps i use 3'' exhaust

I spoke my tuner regarding the 4th gear for the dyno as suggested. He told me that for 5 speeds trans, the dyno is always done in 3rd gear. Only those with 6 speed trans, will be done using the 4th gear.

Mine is only having a 5 speed box.

[Stados]

I've Just put My Mr2 Mk1 on dyno today (hot sunny day)

Test has been done in 4th gear

Car owner : Sébastien Bizier AKA Stados
Car type: Mr2 Mk1
engine type: Redtop
max HP @ RPM : 145.1@7250
max torque @ RPM : 117.9@4750
relevant mods : K&N Air filter, Catless exhaust
A picture of the dyno plot if possible : No Scanner by now, Will install one as soon as I solved my HD issues, and update this post with the sheet.

[puretone]

Originally Posted by nikk1877

can we also see your enlarged throttle body?

that ^^^^ sounds seriously GAY to me!


I run 2.5" exhaust & V-power racing plugs, gonna try and do some piggy-backing with an emanage or something as well, have a FPR installed, AEM air filter feeding air thru a huge intercooler, no cat just a Vibrant resonator & muffler both 2.5"
I guess after some tuning I *should* be able to get numbers close to that as well?

[2old2rusty]

Originally Posted by puretone

that ^^^^ sounds seriously GAY to me!


I run 2.5" exhaust & V-power racing plugs, gonna try and do some piggy-backing with an emanage or something as well, have a FPR installed, AEM air filter feeding air thru a huge intercooler, no cat just a Vibrant resonator & muffler both 2.5"
I guess after some tuning I *should* be able to get numbers close to that as well?

If you're going for the e-manage, I'd suggest you go for the Ultimate, rather than the older version (blue). Heard that it's much better but just exactly how much better, that I've yet to find out.

I'm quite tempted to upgrade to that & find out for myself but it's rather expensive as compared to the blue version; about twice the price.

If any member here have tried the Ultimate e-manage, pls share the outcome of the results, ya. So that I can consider if the difference is worth the bang for the buck

[Servin]

Originally Posted by Stados

I've Just put My Mr2 Mk1 on dyno today (hot sunny day)

Test has been done in 4th gear

Car owner : Sébastien Bizier AKA Stados
Car type: Mr2 Mk1
engine type: Redtop
max HP @ RPM : 145.1@7250
max torque @ RPM : 117.9@4750
relevant mods : K&N Air filter, Catless exhaust
A picture of the dyno plot if possible : No Scanner by now, Will install one as soon as I solved my HD issues, and update this post with the sheet.

Thats kinda of low for a BEAMS. Are you having a issue with anything?

[Stados]

I running Rich, too rich, at 10 past 6000RPM.
I'll post the sheet soon, I'll took a picture and post it.
Maybe it's my exhaust that is not big enough (use a Mk2 NA stock exhaust).
And potentially it's the temp, I notice a huge decrease of performance when car is hot.
And as I know, the Mustang Dyno used is not the most accurate and sometime we could add about 5 HP.

But I have to figure why it's not higher than that. As I want to reach the 170whp. If you had any hint do not hesitate.

[Stados]

I've seen some of you guy running with SAFC-II, as I know the VVT-i wasn't compatible with SAFC-II, i'm confuse.
Should I grab a SAFC-II to correct my too rich air fuel ratio on m beams ?

[puretone]

Originally Posted by Stados

I've seen some of you guy running with SAFC-II, as I know the VVT-i wasn't compatible with SAFC-II, i'm confuse.
Should I grab a SAFC-II to correct my too rich air fuel ratio on m beams ?

stock intake and stock exhaust (perhaps you really should swap out the restrictive MK1 exhaust....that worries me...) *should* in theory make it run 'normal' under load. There is no real reason why your ECU should make your engine run rich (with all OEM intake/exhaust/sensors) unless there is something amiss like a vacuum leak or similar.
So you *should* not need an extra fueling controller unless you have intake/exhaust/cam/valves modifications.

[Stados]

Please remove this Post, I have duplicate it with the correct URL

[Stados]

I have a retrictive MK2 NA exhaust so I was thinking it's enought
I use tranny from 5sfe too, it's fun to drive and really short, but a bit of slip when shifting when I push hard gear after gear.
I use a fuel pump from Mk1 NA. And Part are OEM.
But the Dyno mesure the AirFuelRatio and I start at 14 and down to 10 by the end of RPM range

Here is a Picture of the engine bay(without the K&N air filter), if you see anything su****ious, tell it to me, I'm not as good as many of you seems to be. I have paid for that swap because I love NA feeling.
http://i175.photobucket.com/albums/w...out-2k8006.jpg

And here is the Dyno Sheet :
http://i175.photobucket.com/albums/w...ept-2k8001.jpg
http://i175.photobucket.com/albums/w...ept-2k8002.jpg
http://i175.photobucket.com/albums/w...ept-2k8003.jpg

[2old2rusty]

Originally Posted by Servin

Thats kinda of low for a BEAMS. Are you having a issue with anything?

Stados' ran the dyno on 4th gear, so probably that's the reason his figures read lower, no ? That's what Celica RA45 pointed out to me when I ran mine in 3rd gear.

I've seen some of you guy running with SAFC-II, as I know the VVT-i wasn't compatible with SAFC-II, i'm confuse.
Should I grab a SAFC-II to correct my too rich air fuel ratio on m beams ?

I'm no expert but I think you had better forget about the SAFC. I've used it on my previous 3S-GE. It does show an increase of more than 12 ps on the dyno sheet but seriously, it felt no difference when I drove it.

Since the blue version of the E-Manage price nowadays are quite similiar with the SAFC, I suggest that you might as well go for the E-Manage, Stados. I'm using it on my BEAMS now & I'm quite happy with the improvement.

[Lion_HUN]

Originally Posted by 2old2rusty

Stados' ran the dyno on 4th gear, so probably that's the reason his figures read lower, no ?

No, dyno run should be made in 4th gear, because the gear ratio is near 1.0 there.