![]() |
|
|
|
#101 (permalink) |
|
ST185 Powered SW20
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 2,959
Thanks: 9
Thanked 106 Times in 92 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (8/100% ) |
He still ran awesome with the stock ECU. It still never pulled timing.
Even driving the car through the California/Nevada desert (the Mojave) at 110-120 degrees it wasnt necessarily as FAST as it should be, but it still felt alot more linear, smoother, and it has CONSISTENTLY in this altitude/climate ran better than my Gen2. Id rather have his engine over mine any day of the week. |
|
|
|
|
|
#102 (permalink) |
|
Some Skills
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Salt lake City Utah Mormon country
Posts: 141
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
I'd have to say my gen3 with stock ecu is tempermental. When it gets cold outside the thing will pull timing and you can feel the car lose power no question. I am putting a power fc in the car and we'll see if it makes a difference. it is not onsistently pulling timing but it is kind of hit and miss. it is enough to piss you off though. I don't drive my car in the winter anymore. i noticed it a whloe lot more on my last car than on this one. It's only happened once this last fall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#103 (permalink) |
|
√(176400)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 2,410
Thanks: 27
Thanked 52 Times in 45 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (4/100% ) |
How large of a power loss are we talking here, and with what kind of temperatures?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 (permalink) |
|
ST185 Powered SW20
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 2,959
Thanks: 9
Thanked 106 Times in 92 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (8/100% ) |
Dunno.
Again, the car went through one full summer and one full winter on the stock ECU and never once did I really feel it pull timing. But definately it feels better with the MINES. Im just saying that in my experience, all things being equal, the Gen2 is more sensitive to any climate change, way more than a gen3. |
|
|
|
|
|
#105 (permalink) |
|
Some Skills
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Salt lake City Utah Mormon country
Posts: 141
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
I'm talking about 30-40 degrees and below. It didn't do it all the time. My current car did it once this last fall. I would say 30hp is what it feels like. The 1st time I dynoed my previous car it did it. The car was running at that point 240 whp and still 275 ftlbs. The 2nd time I had it dynoed it ran 270 whp and again 275ftlbs. The curve looked like crap at 5k power would just drop. That day was like 20 or less. Despite the ECU being tempermental I would still prefer the gen3 over a gen2. A gen2 is not all that tempermental running close to stock but they do have their moments as well. I've had gen2's running a ct20 with exhaust, intake, downpipe, intercooler and 17 psi run inconsistently as well. Older gen2 setups have bugs as well. I've yet to fool with any type of Ems on my cars but I have friends who have gen3's with the power fc who've never experienced the bugs I have. They live in warmer climates though and this obviously has something to do with it. I highly doubt you'll have issues in Washington. Your altitude and climate are more like japan where gen3's were built to run. I'd be surprised to hear if many people in California have experienced these issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#106 (permalink) | |
|
Devil's Advocate for Hire
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 796
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (1/100% ) |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 (permalink) |
|
ST185 Powered SW20
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 2,959
Thanks: 9
Thanked 106 Times in 92 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (8/100% ) |
Dude, me and 47mr2s live in the same place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 (permalink) |
|
ST185 Powered SW20
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 2,959
Thanks: 9
Thanked 106 Times in 92 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (8/100% ) |
But in the end its about preference.
I still stick with the other guys who say Gen3s just feel better. I just think its a better engine overall. Its a matter of preference. Borinal has a Gen3. I have a Gen2. Both of our cars run great and if I had a CT20b Id prolly be close to as fast as him, or faster, but I still like his engine better than mine. It just feels smoother. I dunno. I just like the Gen3. Ive driven several Gen2 MR2s. I just prefer the Gen3. And I think thats pretty much what the other guys with Gen3s will say. It just FEELS like a better engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 (permalink) | |
|
Devil's Advocate for Hire
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 796
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (1/100% ) |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 (permalink) |
|
Some Skills
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Salt lake City Utah Mormon country
Posts: 141
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
The gen3 is capable of more than 300 whp without replacing the turbo. You will need the usual plus fuel and some type of tuning. An SAFC will do the job but I'd rather go Ems. You will be pushing the ct20 to its' near limit but it can be done. I feelthat the ct20 is a fairly fragile turbo beyond 16 psi but it is capable of 20. A friend claimed he made 340whp @ 20 psi with usual bolt ons on his gen3 plus tuning at sea level. I beleive it is possible and heis a very reliable source. The car was tuned by Noshoes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 (permalink) | |
|
Some Skills
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Salt lake City Utah Mormon country
Posts: 141
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#112 (permalink) | |
|
Some Skills
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Salt lake City Utah Mormon country
Posts: 141
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#113 (permalink) | |
|
Devil's Advocate for Hire
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 796
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (1/100% ) |
Quote:
![]() I have respect for the Gen2. I think if going for high HP is your goal, it's possibly the best choice. I just think that for 300hp+- ish the gen3 is perfect. Its the Newer version of the 3s, why wouldn't it be? I know the turbo is fragile at high boost, but it pulls so smooth. The difference between a gen2 and gen3 is quite astounding. The Gen2 throws you back in the seat much more than the gen3, but the gen3 is actually faster. For personal reasons, that is awesome for me. I have all kinds of weird injuries from the accidents I've been in (3 times I've been in a 45mph+ accident of someone else's fault), and riding or driving in a car that unnecessarily jerks my head around makes my neck sore. The Gen3 I owned was the fastest car I've been in that didn't make my neck sore. I'm sold. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 (permalink) | |
|
Some Skills
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Salt lake City Utah Mormon country
Posts: 141
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#115 (permalink) | |
|
Google Ron Paul
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 7,012
Thanks: 93
Thanked 126 Times in 106 Posts
Blog Entries: 7
My Google Map |
Quote:
He presently has 4 Gen 3 motors in his stable. He sees both sides of the table though, and understands the whole debate is moot. The "best" option will vary depending on what you are looking for, what your goals are, and your financial position.
__________________
Brian - My MR2Trader Ads - Click here for order or shipping status if you've bought something from me recently. Technical Questions - Please post them on the forums. Others who may have the same problem don't benefit from a PM exchange. If you wish to have my input I have no problem with a PM containing a link to a thread you have already posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#116 (permalink) |
|
i gots great moobs!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SL, UT
Posts: 130
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
personal opinion having owned 4 mr2 turbos 2 with usdm gen 2's and 2 with gen 3's, consdering i see no point in a street car with more than 400 whp the gen 3 is my pick. it does not have the same flow bottleneck at the intake and tb the gen 2 has, and slightly lower compression making it a little more resistant to detonation. but we will see if my car makes the #'s i think it will.
Last edited by bugalu; 01-24-2007 at 05:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#117 (permalink) |
|
New 2
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 910
Thanks: 7
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (1/100% ) |
Lemme put it like this. If you have a capable MR2 chassis and want to spend $5k to make your car go fast, in any condition, indefinitely, without constant twiddling with stuff...there is one option.
BTW...its Gen3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#119 (permalink) |
|
√(176400)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 2,410
Thanks: 27
Thanked 52 Times in 45 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (4/100% ) |
You fanboi Martin.
![]() Is your car done man? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.mr2.com/forums/gen-3-3s-gte/Toyota-MR2-220-gen3-debate.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Toyota MR2 Message Board | This thread | Refback | 09-02-2007 09:41 PM | |
| L337JDM.com :: View topic - Few pics of my MR2 | This thread | Refback | 08-21-2007 12:29 PM | |