Toyota MR2 Message Board

 

Home MR2.com Forum Rules Chat Garage Links Map Showcase Sponsors
Go Back   Toyota MR2 Message Board > Welcome To The Toyota MR2 Board! > MR2Board Sponsors > KO Racing

KO Racing
http://www.koracing.net

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-17-2007, 05:42 PM   #1 (permalink)
Speed Racer
 
2fast4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 542
Thanks: 17
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts





Send a message via AIM to 2fast4u Send a message via MSN to 2fast4u
turbo selection

This is for Kris by the way:

ok I'm not planning to get a turbo kit this year, but possibly next year and I'm trying to get everything planned so I know how much saving I'm gonna have to do lol. I am debating between the t3/t4 street brawler kit with the 46trim but possibly the 50 trim and the gt3071r with a .63 turbine housing. I am looking for about 370whp and I was wondering which is the better turbo? I realize the t3/t4 is cheaper but if the gt3071r is better I'll be getting that. I was wondering what are the main differences between the 2?

Will the gt3071r with .63 turbine housing give me the same or quicker spool time than the t3/t4 46 trim? also compare it to the 50 trim t3/t4.

Will the gt3071r with .63 turbine housing give me more top end than the t3/t4 46 trim? also compare it to the 50 trim t3/t4.

Considering these modifications at about 18-19 psi of boost: 264 camshafts (exhaust and intake), upgraded intercooler, 60mm throttle body, RMR intake manifold, 4 inch intake, 3 in. downpipe, 3in. exhaust, all internals beefed up, water injection. (note I don't have all these parts this is just a future setup and I'm trying to get a good idea what my options are) What power range is the gt3071r with .63 turbine housing in. for example 3200rpm to 7200rpm range? the t3/t4 with 46 trim and also the 50 trim? I don't need exact rpm ranges, just a good ball park figure I guess. like will it give me power all the way up to redline, or more, or less?

Uhh I sent you a message, but I'm not sure if you ever read your messages so I posted this just in case, you can reply by message or posting it, it doesn't matter to me.

Thank you for your time, sorry I wrote so much.
2fast4u is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2007, 01:04 AM   #2 (permalink)
KO Racing Dude
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 104
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

My Google Map



Send a message via AIM to Loki
Hi 2fast4u,
Unfortunately, I do not have dyno testing to compare the t3/t4 versus the 3071. My current best guess is that the 3071 will spool somewhere between the 46 and the 50 trim, but I don't have data to back this up at the current time. I hope to be able to do some testing in the next couple months.

As for the "all internals beefed up", what does that mean for head work? OS valves, fully ported?

As far as my best guess, I believ the 3071 will spool somewhere between the 46trim and the 50 trim. I believe it will make more top end than the 46 and the same or a little less top end than the 50trim. I think at the boost level (18-19) any of the turbo choices should have no problem making good power to 7500rpm. The 46 will be the first to start losing on the airflow side should you go to a higher rpm, or to more boost given your other airflow mods.

I hope that has helped you a little.
Loki is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 2004-2006 - East Coast Imports, LLC
Page generated in 0.20504 seconds with 199 queries