For Sale: 500hp 93T t-top MR2!

[MR JAS]

Originally Posted by tigerpee

OMG! This is the guy who got banned on the other board cuz he couldn't handle taking constructive criticism on the dyno chart. I remember reading that you started spamming gay porn and huge pictures on every thread for like 5 hours. HAHAHAHA! LOL!

quick someone dis his midrange

[Ncturnal]

Originally Posted by hookedup96rolla

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v8...oplot421-1.jpg

little dip at 90 is a mis-fire due to stock original coil not being able to keep up. now replaced with an MSD one.

Shouldn't the torque and hp intersect at 5250?

[hookedup96rolla]

graphs is in speed, not rpm's.

[1993MR2NA]

"I remember reading that you started spamming gay porn and huge pictures on every thread for like 5 hours."

---
Thanks a lot tigerpee. Now all the gays know how to extract free porn from this thread!

[countyboy3188]

Originally Posted by Ncturnal

Shouldn't the torque and hp intersect at 5250?

yes it should. It should also intersect there regardless if it measured in speed or rpms.

another thing this car should make way more power before you get to this point of intersection and it def should make more than 200 hp before this intersection

I don't think this is a dyno graph of a mr2.

[hookedup96rolla]

Originally Posted by countyboy3188

yes it should. It should also intersect there regardless if it measured in speed or rpms.

another thing this car should make way more power before you get to this point of intersection and it def should make more than 200 hp before this intersection

I don't think this is a dyno graph of a mr2.

do you think i stole a dyno graph of another car and posted it? would you like to contact my tuner or the shop to verify this graph and these numbers? its an old school turbo and everything about the car is set up for top end. the car is conservative on the timing, has a big turbo, has 272s, and a big intake manifold. all these things combined = slower spool n nasty top end. it's great how i go outside the box and don't follow everyone elses setups and then make a ton more power and get called out on it. this is why this community is sooooo far behind all others, no one is willing to see what these cars can take. this is why you don't see numbers like this regularly. people who do make the power are called out for bs'ing and whatnot and decide to just keep to themselves instead of having to try and prove their cars to people who have bolt-ons making half the hp as this. if its not what ever other mr2 has done then it's not right according to most of you.
and you know exactly what rpm's the car is turning at 67mph with my wheel n tire setup? i bet its real close to 5250.

[MR JAS]

and i love how people go off and look like a dickhead

lets recap the thread
1. someone said you got banned from another board for going apeshit when someone disputed you dyno graph
2. people start disputing your dyno graph
3. you go apeshit

THEY ARE TROLLING LET IT GO

[hookedup96rolla]

I'm not going off at all. I'm explaining the car and then going into detail as to why no one believes it. I went outside what is considered normal and therefore am being chastised for it.
i love this community.......

[Sang]

Originally Posted by countyboy3188

yes it should. It should also intersect there regardless if it measured in speed or rpms.

another thing this car should make way more power before you get to this point of intersection and it def should make more than 200 hp before this intersection

I don't think this is a dyno graph of a mr2.

65mph with stock sized wheels/tires in 3rd gear is 5250.

It would make way more power if the owner used a different turbo, instead he chose to use a cheap lag monster that should've been revved out higher to justify the lag with more top end. Considering he's not making 200 ftlbs of torque until nearly 5800 rpms, it's simply not going to make more power down low.

[hookedup96rolla]

its already rev'ing to 8k, i don't wanna take it much further on stock stuff. as for the car, if it doesn't end up selling I'm gonna change a few things on it and break 500whp.

as for calling it a "cheap" turbo, i wouldn't go that far. Its a quality precision unit and i chose not to spend double the cost for a dbb turbo. the nice thing is that i keep traction in any gear which i know with a dbb and/or slightly smaller turbo i'd be screwed for.

[countyboy3188]

eh yea i guess you are right i got to thinking about it more and more after i said that. i went out and drove my car this morning and the rpm is really close at 65. i should have held my tongue before questioning. i ended up looking like an ass on this one.

I withdraw my statement and good luck with your sale.

[JDM Factory]

nice set up, gl with the sell.

[texasmr2]

Yah that is a sweet MR2. I bought one of the first 'No Cash' exhuast manifolds for my '92 11yr's ago, Billy's a good guy.

[hookedup96rolla]

thanks for the compliments.

yea the no-cash manifold is real badass!

[texasmr2]

Originally Posted by hookedup96rolla

thanks for the compliments.

yea the no-cash manifold is real badass!

I'm sure Billy has perfected them over the last decade which is good new's, mine needed some mod's to fit the Garrett T4/T3 I bought to go with it but hey I'm not complaining. Good peep's he is and I would rather deal with them and minor issue's than the other's.

[hookedup96rolla]

ttt

[KaDuWin]

I agree with you 100% most people also lack the ability and skill to build an engine up with out using a turbo or some other forced induction method. For instance I have been in the NA forum for a little while reading how almost everyone says a 5SFE making 200BHP in NA is impossible, but after a little bit of research I posted a list of mods which should easily build the 5SFE to at least 200BHP without use of any forced induction everything from pistons, cams, ECU remapping to a revamped intake and exhaust system. Its just that most people would rather do the easiest thing and follow what everyone else has already done like slap a bigger turbo on a engine or some other random bolt ons.

Most people are skeptical and or jealous when someone else is able to achieve something that they couldn't. I have seen MR2 pushing over 800 BHP with a single turbo and no NOS. Don't let them get to you.

[CameronTucker]

impressive....

[KaDuWin]

I know I agree, I don't follow what other people do, my dad used to rebuild engines and my cousin builds pro street dragster engines so I've got some knowledge under my belt as far as getting power from engines with using forced induction of any kind. The problem is most people are stuck in this whole (fast and furious) frame of mind where they think everything has to be turbo'd and or they think simple bolt ons with out modifying the engine itself will be enough to compete when normally with bolt ons all they do is put a bigger turbo on a stock engine and increase the spool time because the engine doesn't have as easy of a time spooling the bigger turbo.

Either way I have learned most of the most impressive stuff that has been done with MR2's never makes it tot he forums at all. A friend of mine is a racing instructor and was telling me that he has seen people get over 1000BHP from the 3SGTE at the drag strips.

The bottom line is, hardly any one knows how to tune an engine these days, they look at a turbo or super charger as a simple solution, which is just pathetic. Especially in this day and age when we have access to crucial upgrades all over the place and people only buy turbos. Good talk man.

[texasmr2]

Yes I agree that there are alot of people who say this or that is not achieveable but those people are only ignorant ie mis-informed, they should NOT be referred to as _ _ _ _ _ _. Your speaking directly with one of the first member's ( a member since '97 if you must know) of the MROC that wanted to achieve the glorified goal of having the first 3SGTE to make 1000hp and now that HUX Racing has achieved that goal was I out of my mind? No simply because I believed in the 3SGTE and realized it's potential.

Dont turn this forum into another CivicSi hump with disrespectful commentary or allegation's such as that. I drove MR2's for 21yr's, possibly longer than you have been alive, so I think I know what I'm talking about, dont you?

tex