![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Top Posters | Donate | Projects | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| MK 2 MR2 - SW20 Discussion and tech for 90-99 SW20 MR2. 3S-GTE, 3S-GE, 3S-FE, 5S-FE. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tecky
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Orlando FLA
Posts: 223
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
Stock X Beam VS Cusco Beam
Which adds more chassis rigidity the stock X beam or a Cusco tower strut. (Were talking about the brace ion the engine bay here.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Tecky
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Orlando FLA
Posts: 223
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
BUMP!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Beams Owners Group
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: On Hiatus.......
Posts: 7,897
Thanks: 84
Thanked 257 Times in 197 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
My Google Map |
Cusco without a doubt. I found the stock x brace to be extremely flimsy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Can you say grippy?
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,513
Thanks: 12
Thanked 99 Times in 83 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
^ I haven't used a Cusco but yeah the stock X brace is really flimsy compared to pretty much anything else. I will probably make my own to replace it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
ST185 Powered SW20
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 2,959
Thanks: 9
Thanked 106 Times in 92 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (8/100% ) |
The stock xbrace is good for looks only. Theres no way that thing braces anything. I noticed NO difference taking mine off.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| chassis, cusco, rigidity, x beam |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|