![]() |
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Some Skills
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northern Victoria, Australia
Posts: 93
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
proposed tire setup
I'm thinking about changing over my 93+ stockies (94 car) over to a pair of 17x7 205/40/17 front and 17x8 235/40/17 rear, both with a ET35 offset.
Question is, do you think i should have spacers (front or rear) or should ET35 be sufficent clearance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Dreaming of apexes
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 4,436
Thanks: 114
Thanked 219 Times in 192 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (7/100% ) |
That's the same size I'm using on Sparco Racing NT-01 wheels. Unfortunately I can't remember what my offset is.
__________________
"Inside the car, the world beyond the driver's immediate horizon ceases to exist. Alone with the solitude of his desire, survival sense numbed by the speed, he's outrun the mediocrity of the outside world, slipped the shackles it tries to clamp on us all. He is running free, chased only by a fear of failure, for failure is to risk ejection into the real world." ~Mark Hughes |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Wheels make the car.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 2,331
Thanks: 4
Thanked 54 Times in 52 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (3/100% ) |
very nice conservative setup.
spacers would give you less clearance to the fenders. none are needed for clearance to the suspension.
__________________
WHEELSPECS.COM - a ridiculous number of wheel pics & links |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Emperor Jspec
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 847
Thanks: 94
Thanked 45 Times in 44 Posts
iTrader Rating: (1/100% ) |
those are great sizes and offsets. imo, i wouldn't use spacers because they'll look great already. however, i'd run 215/40/17 and 245/40/17.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|