![]() |
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
El Dominicano
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 53
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (2/100% ) |
Wheel/Tire Combo with Koni's and TRD Springs
So I'm shopping around for rims and am currently trying to figure out the ideal rim and tire sizes for my mkII. It is my daily driver and as the title says, I have koni struts and trd springs. Right now I'm trying to decide:
-whether to get 17's all around or get 16's in front and 17's in the back because I've noticed in some pics that sometimes the rear wheels look smaller than the front -would also like to have the least amount of wheel gap possible without rubbing though even more important is that the fronts don't have more wheel gap than the rears -I'm kind of clueless when it comes to offsets but I would like the stance to be flush -also, what would I need to do to make my stock 14's flush for when I use them in the winter? Any input (and pics) will be greatly appreciated. Trying to do this right the 1st time ![]() Last edited by ARMIN; 07-06-2009 at 12:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
El Dominicano
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 53
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (2/100% ) |
Found a car that kinda has what I'm going for. It's owned by rhd_sw20. Says his setup is though I'm not sure on the suspension:
F: 17*8 +35 with a 3mm spacer 215/45/R17 R: 17*9 +35 with a 25mm spacer 225/45/R17 ![]() ![]() Last edited by ARMIN; 07-06-2009 at 12:59 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Midship Specialty
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vantastic, BC
Posts: 957
Thanks: 0
Thanked 58 Times in 57 Posts
iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
That's a good wheel width, but I'd drop the spacers and stick with the +35 offset. If you're worried about the wheel looking too small in the rear, you might want to choose 16x8" +35 in front w/ 225/45 and mount 245/40-17s out back on those 17x9s instead of those skinny 225s pictured.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
El Dominicano
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 53
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (2/100% ) |
Yeah I think I'm going to go with the 16/17 setup. And yeah I would prefer to not have to use spacers, but what's your reason for not using them? Somebody said I could get the same stance with a 8 + 25-30mm front and 9 + 10mm rear. I'm not completely sure what it takes to roll fenders, but if it won't damage my paint, I might do it. Oh, I haven't mentioned this but my father owns a used tire shop. As of now I think I'm going to go with 16x8 and 17x9. Once I figure out the offsets, I can order the wheels. Then, I can try on different size tires from the shop to figure out which ones don't rub. What do you think?
Last edited by ARMIN; 07-07-2009 at 04:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Midship Specialty
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vantastic, BC
Posts: 957
Thanks: 0
Thanked 58 Times in 57 Posts
iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
Spacers add more unsprung weight for mostly cosmetic appreciation and only a marginal performance gain. Unless they have built-in hubcentric rings, spacers tend to create some wheel shimmy at speeds over 50 mph. Best to buy hubcentric rings fitted to a wheel in the correct offset to begin with (if possible).
Quote:
You're very lucky to have someone close to you with a tire shop. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
El Dominicano
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 53
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (2/100% ) |
Okay, so after doing a bunch of research, I think I'm going to go with the following in order to be flush:
F: 16x7 +23 R: 17x8 +23 So, keeping in mind that the TRD springs drop the car 1", what are the biggest tires that you guys would recommend for this setup without rubbing? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Midship Specialty
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vantastic, BC
Posts: 957
Thanks: 0
Thanked 58 Times in 57 Posts
iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
That's an excellent choice of wheel sizes/offsets.
A rub-free ride would be 215/45-16 front and 235/40-17 rear. A bit more aggressive with borderline rubbing is 225/45 front and 245/40 rear. On my last MKII, the TRD springs dropped the car more like 1.5", not 1". |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
El Dominicano
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 53
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (2/100% ) |
1.5"? Is that common? I read something about that happening because there are American and Japanese TRD springs but I'm not sure (Japanese springs being the lower drop). Do you think I should keep the 30mm difference in widths between front and rear tires like the stock '93+?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Midship Specialty
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vantastic, BC
Posts: 957
Thanks: 0
Thanked 58 Times in 57 Posts
iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
I've driven tons of tire setups ranging from 205/215 to 225/275 and they all work well (with 225/245 being one of the best and 215/235 coming in a close second) More exaggerated front/rear tire width stagger will demand a bit more attention from the driver, but that's the only concern - fatter rear rubber never hurt anyone driving a Mark II. So don't sweat it, as long as you're staggered you'll be fine..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
…
|
I'm not a big fan of choosing wheels that will require spacers. Some people will not notice the lack of hub-centric issues, others can feel the penny under a stack of ten mattresses. Highly subjective.
An unpleasant issue with MKII MR2's is the relative lack of wheels available in staggered sizes (either diameter and/or width) and tires that will fit the wheels well. Having the luxury of trial and error associated with your father's shop, remember that the same size tire produced by different manufacturers can vary greatly in width. If you are comfortable using different tires (manufacturer, model) front and rear, then you can play with the different set-ups much more. What I would recommend for someone else is different from what I would use myself. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
El Dominicano
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 53
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (2/100% ) |
RePete, I thought a more exaggerated front/rear tire width stagger would make the car less prone to over-steer.. Why would it demand more attention from the driver?
palos, are you saying that the +23 offset would require spacers or are you referring to the picture of the black MR2? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Midship Specialty
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vantastic, BC
Posts: 957
Thanks: 0
Thanked 58 Times in 57 Posts
iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
Very true on your oversteer comment, but there's more front end scrub. Just last night I threw on a set of 205/45-16s and then mounted 255/40-17s out back. The rear felt well planted but the front needs more grip, I experienced some understeer as I hurried down an off-ramp. By doing that one may let off the throttle just a bit, but enough to engage a touch of drop-throttle oversteer as the momentum shifts towards the front. It was controllable though, so no problem - but needed a bit more attention than a more neutral 225/245 combo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
El Dominicano
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 53
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (2/100% ) |
Were all the tires the same brand/condition?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Cage Fighter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,140
Thanks: 9
Thanked 70 Times in 66 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (7/100% ) |
I am going to be running a 235/255 17'' combo here soon (within the next 2-3 weeks), and I can let you now how that handles. I am hoping the fronts won't be too big, but we'll see. Remind me if I don't reply to this thread, I tend to forget haha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Midship Specialty
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vantastic, BC
Posts: 957
Thanks: 0
Thanked 58 Times in 57 Posts
iTrader Rating: (0/0% ) |
Absolutely, as always.
![]() I'll remind you! It's always nice to get feedback on a very rare 235 front setup. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
El Dominicano
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 53
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (2/100% ) |
Wow... Finding rims is harder than I thought.. Do you guys know of any rims that look like these and have better offsets? They're the Drag Dr-19's
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Cage Fighter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Cental NY
Posts: 115
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Rating: (2/100% ) |
Thats the problem I am having.. I want to run 16s but finding a 16x8+ for the rear is tough.. I may go 17" in the back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Cage Fighter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,140
Thanks: 9
Thanked 70 Times in 66 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (7/100% ) |
Quote:
Aaron at ATS says he fit it on stock camber on a 17x8 +35 (just like I have...) w/o any mods or anything. Hopefully it'll be the same for me! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
El Dominicano
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 53
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (2/100% ) |
So I finally got the Koni shocks and TRD springs on and I'm very happy with how the car came out. I'm still thinking about rims so as of now I still have the stock 14's. Here's some before and after pics for reference on the drop:
BEFORE ![]() Last edited by ARMIN; 10-06-2009 at 04:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Cage Fighter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: springfield illinois
Posts: 1,014
Thanks: 89
Thanked 21 Times in 21 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|