![]() |
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Yup
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hampton VA
Posts: 595
Thanks: 26
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (7/100% ) |
Wheels.?!?
Yup...So why do people put bigger wheels in the rear rather than in the front? Preference?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Canuck
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 128
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
iTrader Rating: (1/100% ) |
RWD it allows you to put more power to the ground, more surface area = more traction. Front tires would not be beneficial to have wider.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 2,621
Thanks: 120
Thanked 55 Times in 54 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (4/100% ) |
That just about sums it up. The wider the wheel, the bigger the contact patch. Which is why I find it funny when people do that to their FWD honda.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Yup
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hampton VA
Posts: 595
Thanks: 26
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (7/100% ) |
I understand the wider wheels...what i mean is like..16's in the front and 18's in the back...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
gimme some turns
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,685
Thanks: 76
Thanked 82 Times in 70 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (5/100% ) |
the front fender, wheel gap, etc is smaller than the rear - keeps it in proportion in some people's opinion / tastes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Yup
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hampton VA
Posts: 595
Thanks: 26
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (7/100% ) |
I just know on pre runner trucks we used to build we would do the opposite.. allows the front tire more contact time or something..like a 17 up front and a 15 in the rear.. same or similar diamter but different rotational mass or contact time or something.. Brain is a full of goo today stoopid swine flu..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Wheels make the car.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 2,671
Thanks: 4
Thanked 86 Times in 82 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (3/100% ) |
Looks & tire choices.
choices for wide rear tires anything smaller than 17 for the back are rather pathetic. The body shape/lines lends itself to a larger rear diameter wheel. Multipiece wheels with a lip look smaller the deeper the lip is - optical illusion. If you run a 17x7 +35 up front with a 25mm lip depth it will appear to be a larger diameter than a 17x9 +35 out back with a 65mm lip depth. Running a larger diameter rear allows the large lip depth difference and makes the wheels look "even."
__________________
WHEELSPECS.COM - a ridiculous number of wheel pics & links |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Yup
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hampton VA
Posts: 595
Thanks: 26
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (7/100% ) |
Other than looks. and the benefit of having a tire choice of a fatter tire in the rear. is there a performance value of have a front tire that is overall smaller in diameter. To extremes I am just thinking about like a tractor..you know big arse tires in the rear and small useless tires in the front..I would just think that having a overall bigger diameter in the front would help with understeer...or mabye the smaller tires help with oversteer?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 2,621
Thanks: 120
Thanked 55 Times in 54 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (4/100% ) |
Well on MR2s, you can't have too big of a front tire, or it won't clear the springs. :/
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Wheels make the car.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 2,671
Thanks: 4
Thanked 86 Times in 82 Posts
My Google Map iTrader Rating: (3/100% ) |
Quote:
The double stagger only increases that slightly. Still going with roughly the same OD regardless of wheel diameter. If you have a 16 front you can use a 205/45 16 or if you have a 17 front you can use a 205/40 17 ...... same OD. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|