We-todd-racing.com

[Ncturnal]

I have contacted them to have the site added to the Allowed sites list. I'm awaiting their response. In the meantime, you will get a message stating that this site is not supported. I will keep you posted.

[canadam]

Does that mean that we won't have to put up with their banner ?

Originally Posted by Ncturnal

I have contacted them to have the site added to the Allowed sites list. I'm awaiting their response. In the meantime, you will get a message stating that this site is not supported. I will keep you posted.

[MustangR2]

hurry up and fix it. jesus. haha Just kidding

[GReddySetGO]

Heres some free image hosting sites I use.

http://imageshack.us/
http://www.uploadimages.net/index.php

These are simple browse for pics, and upload them, same as WTDR, except you don't need any accounts or anything. Just upload and remote link.

[Ncturnal]

Should be working now. They added us to the list.

[MustangR2]

Originally Posted by Ncturnal

Should be working now. They added us to the list.

good job nct. man u are all over it

[Paul Boz]

imageshack.us is much better, in that there's no hastle to log in or anything.

[EL PAALO]

Now that wetodd tags images with crap it isn't a good service.
There are much better resources also available free.

[GReddySetGO]

Yes, like the links I posted earlier

[NoSirItsAToyota]

Originally Posted by Paul Boz

imageshack.us is much better, in that there's no hastle to log in or anything.

Imageshack is awesome. The only thing I don't like is that they took away the option where it only adds the [img] tags. Now you either have to add them yourself or use the thumbnail option. They are still all I use though.

[Paul Boz]

Originally Posted by NoSirItsAToyota

Imageshack is awesome. The only thing I don't like is that they took away the option where it only adds the [img] tags. Now you either have to add them yourself or use the thumbnail option. They are still all I use though.

Actually a friend of mine runs imageshack, and he had to stop using the preset [img] tags because it was costing too much to maintain the servers. He actually makes quite a nice sum of money on advertising on his site (those banners really do generate a ton of money for him) and he found that by making them default to thumbnails he can make more money to pay for the bandwith. That and a lot of times people are happy with a thumbnail and don't need a 300k image, which also cuts down on the server usage. It was either cut down on the size of the image, or get rid of the preset img tags, and he felt that getting rid of a high image size would make his service useless.

[NoSirItsAToyota]

Originally Posted by Paul Boz

Actually a friend of mine runs imageshack, and he had to stop using the preset [img] tags because it was costing too much to maintain the servers. He actually makes quite a nice sum of money on advertising on his site (those banners really do generate a ton of money for him) and he found that by making them default to thumbnails he can make more money to pay for the bandwith. That and a lot of times people are happy with a thumbnail and don't need a 300k image, which also cuts down on the server usage. It was either cut down on the size of the image, or get rid of the preset img tags, and he felt that getting rid of a high image size would make his service useless.

Ahh that does make sense. I really do miss that IMG tag option though since most of the time I would prefer not to have a thumbnail. I'll just keep adding the tags myself.